On 14/08/2009 19:53, Jarkko Oranen wrote:
>
> I'm not sure whether defonce is useful enough that it should be moved
> to core, so I'll abstain.
>
>
I use defonce and defonce- quite a lot.
I'm all for inclusion of c.c.def in core.
Sacha
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
