Docs for cutting edge Clojure are on the way. Rich said he was going to think about the approach he wanted to take and we'll get it up and running when he gets back from vacation.
Hang tight, Tom On Aug 14, 10:21 am, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: > As long as the documentation doesn't disappear between the time the > library is removed from contrib and the appropriate version (1.1, 1.2) > of Clojure is released. > > Not-so-subtle > hint:http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/8f191d3a9... > > Sean > > On Aug 14, 12:52 pm, Daniel Lyons <fus...@storytotell.org> wrote: > > > On Aug 14, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Chas Emerick wrote: > > > > Seeing that some contrib libs have been promoted into the main clojure > > > project, I'd like to suggest that the same be done for > > > clojure.contrib.def (or, the majority of it). We use it nearly > > > everywhere, and I suspect many others do as well. > > > > As a slight caveat, I'm not sure that the defalias, defhinted, or > > > name- > > > with-attributes members in def are central enough and/or used enough > > > to warrant promotion. It seems reasonable that they'd be "left > > > behind" in c.c.def, with the other forms promoted -- either into > > > core.clj or into a clojure.def namespace. > > > > Thoughts? > > > I myself am rather fond of defvar. I'm for it. > > > — > > Daniel Lyons --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
