As long as the documentation doesn't disappear between the time the library is removed from contrib and the appropriate version (1.1, 1.2) of Clojure is released.
Not-so-subtle hint: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/8f191d3a9620977 Sean On Aug 14, 12:52 pm, Daniel Lyons <fus...@storytotell.org> wrote: > On Aug 14, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Chas Emerick wrote: > > > > > Seeing that some contrib libs have been promoted into the main clojure > > project, I'd like to suggest that the same be done for > > clojure.contrib.def (or, the majority of it). We use it nearly > > everywhere, and I suspect many others do as well. > > > As a slight caveat, I'm not sure that the defalias, defhinted, or > > name- > > with-attributes members in def are central enough and/or used enough > > to warrant promotion. It seems reasonable that they'd be "left > > behind" in c.c.def, with the other forms promoted -- either into > > core.clj or into a clojure.def namespace. > > > Thoughts? > > I myself am rather fond of defvar. I'm for it. > > — > Daniel Lyons --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
