Hi, On Jul 27, 11:46 pm, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this depend on the distinction between "seq" and > "collection". For example, I personally consider a string a seq, but > not a collection. Hmm.. IMHO it's the other way around: a String is a collection and not a seq. It surely is seqable, but not a seq itself. Sincerely Meikel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
