I'm not sure if it should change. I think this depend on the distinction between "seq" and "collection". For example, I personally consider a string a seq, but not a collection.
Is this a proper distinction? On Jul 27, 5:36 pm, eyeris <drewpvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > The docstring should also be changed by replacing "seq" with > "collection". > > On Jul 27, 12:39 pm, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Yeah, but this case is different because nth is much faster if the > > input is a vector, and calling seq on the input will actually degrade > > the performance for vector inputs. > > > Maybe you could test for vectorness, and call seq otherwise. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
