It calls nth and count, both of which except a collection, according to their docstrings.
On Jul 27, 4:46 pm, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure if it should change. > > I think this depend on the distinction between "seq" and > "collection". For example, I personally consider a string a seq, but > not a collection. > > Is this a proper distinction? > > On Jul 27, 5:36 pm, eyeris <drewpvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The docstring should also be changed by replacing "seq" with > > "collection". > > > On Jul 27, 12:39 pm, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Yeah, but this case is different because nth is much faster if the > > > input is a vector, and calling seq on the input will actually degrade > > > the performance for vector inputs. > > > > Maybe you could test for vectorness, and call seq otherwise. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
