On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Vagif Verdi<vagif.ve...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jul 19, 4:19 pm, "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <hls...@gmail.com> wrote: >> You seem to have a better idea of what's going in in Cascade than I >> do, and I'm the one writing it. Please be patient. > > I was replying to the author of the thread who said there are 2 > clojure web frameworks. Cascade could very well become a great web > framework. But it is a toy right now. As for being patient, i'm not in > a hurry.
There are way more than two web frameworks for clojure out there right now. It seems like every other month there is an announcement for a new framework. No offence to Howard or any of the others, but at this point, Compojure has the most momentum. That's okay though. If it weren't for new people playing around with HttpServlet and it's ilk, we wouldn't have the Ring protocol, and that would be a bad thing. There's a lot of potential for Clojure on the web, and there is lot's of neat things you could do with the expresiveness of Clojure, but at this point, it looks like Compojure is going to be the de jure choice for web work. As a side note, I would happily purchase the book if Pragmatic or some others ever decided to put out a "Functional Web Development (with Compojure/Clojure)" type book. (You can have the name.) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
