On Jul 19, 9:49 am, Wilson MacGyver <wmacgy...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are already two webframework in clojure being developed. > Compojure and cascade. While I'm eagerly waiting to see how these two > and others will envole
Not much to wait there. Compojure is quite stable and feature rich now. It is a low level web framework. You have to explicitly manage urls and code html by hand, using their html combinatorics library. There's nothing wrong with being a low level web framework. You certainly can build up upon it. I'm currently migrating our web application from plain java servlets to compojure. Cascase is not even a web framework yet. It is a toy. And sadly from what i've seen so far, it took the same path as compojure: explicitly dealing with urls and manually building html pages with its own library. No high level object/widget approach a-la Seaside, Weblocks, Rails etc. So there's a space for different kind of web frameworks in clojure ecosystem. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
