On Jul 19, 1:24 pm, Vagif Verdi <vagif.ve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 19, 9:49 am, Wilson MacGyver <wmacgy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There are already two webframework in clojure being developed.
> > Compojure and cascade. While I'm eagerly waiting to see how these two
> > and others will envole
>
> Not much to wait there. Compojure is quite stable and feature rich
> now. It is a low level web framework. You have to explicitly manage
> urls and code html by hand, using their html combinatorics library.
> There's nothing wrong with being a low level web framework. You
> certainly can build up upon it. I'm currently migrating our web
> application from plain java servlets to compojure.
>
> Cascase is not even a web framework yet. It is a toy. And sadly from
> what i've seen so far, it took the same path as compojure: explicitly
> dealing with urls and manually building html pages with its own
> library. No high level object/widget approach a-la Seaside, Weblocks,
> Rails etc.
> So there's a space for different kind of web frameworks in clojure
> ecosystem.
You seem to have a better idea of what's going in in Cascade than I
do, and I'm the one writing it. Please be patient.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
