On Jul 5, 1:23 pm, Richard Newman <holyg...@gmail.com> wrote: > However, I'd point out that: > > * This might be a sign that you're doing things 'wrong'.
Could be. I'm still figuring out how to do things the functional way. The reason I have these nested maps is to give my data structure. I don't want to have a loose collection of things. It is easier to understand the hierarchical structure. Otoh you have to change the whole path up to the top of the hierarchy. > * You could always use a ref in your map instead of a concrete set -- That's right. I think I want to have a ref there anyway for another reason. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
