Hi,

Am 29.05.2009 um 18:28 schrieb CuppoJava:

I haven't thought of using an anonymous function. That cleans things
up a bit. Meikel points out that it is sometimes desirable to have
access to the original function though. I haven't had a need for it
before, but it seems useful.

There are other subtle differences...

Using an in place anonymous function suffers from the same
problems as the macro.

- You have to re-compile every code module using the macro
  when you change something in the anon fn.
- You get a new anon function whenever call the macro. So
  the code size is increased.

So you loose most of the advantages of using a function in
the first place..

Sincerely
Meikel

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to