Thanks Rock and Laurent for the explanation. I haven't thought of using an anonymous function. That cleans things up a bit. Meikel points out that it is sometimes desirable to have access to the original function though. I haven't had a need for it before, but it seems useful.
And thanks Rock for the step-by-step expansion instructions. That's exactly the sort of reasoning I was looking for. -Patrick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
