Nathan Hawkins a écrit :
> Ok, my example seems to have misled. You're missing the point a little
> bit:
>
> 1. I was trying to avoid the (reduce conj {} ...), by having the map
> function do it. Why even build a list that's only going to get thrown
> away when I want a hash-map at the end?
>
> 2. The functions used to split the strings were not important, only an
> example. It could just as easily be a function to extract fields from a
> java object.
>
>
> To some extent, I guess I'm thinking in terms of Common Lisp, where I'd
> build an a-list with mapcar and cons.
>
With f a function that return a [key value] pair (or a (key value) pair
but not a {key value} pair):
(reduce #(apply assoc %1 (f %2)) {} coll)
if you want to have f return a map you can
(reduce #(merge %1 (f %2)) {} coll)
--
Professional: http://cgrand.net/ (fr)
On Clojure: http://clj-me.blogspot.com/ (en)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
