2009/4/18 Dan <redalas...@gmail.com> > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I guess there's really no perfect solution here :-( >> >> The question is : >> >> do you prefer to have some clojure users united against subversion, or >> divided by Rich not having chosen their preferred DVCS (Mercurial users vs >> Git users, not sure whether clojure needs those kinds of nonsense internal >> wars in the community ....) >> > > We seem to be unanimous in preferring git.
A last word from me on the subject : unanimous is certainly not the right term here, if you consider that at least Rich disagrees (and unanimity implies "all people", not even one let apart). And you can also count on me, Meikel Brandmeyer (author of VimClojure), maybe Paul Drummond (?) that pointed to python's decision to use Mercurial. But if 'unanimity' is not the right word, I admit that it seems that 'majority' would be. Anyway, since I don't want to start or continue a pointless DVCS comparison war, I won't even give any argument here in favor of mercurial or git. Rich is the main maintainer of clojure source, just let him use the DVCS he wants. And really, it's not that difficult to checkout a working copy of svn, hack on it, and do a svn diff > mypatch.diff to send him when ready (so more complex management cases may well be easier with DVCs in the contributor side, of course) ... Regards, -- Laurent > > In the meantime, I'm using svn-git to track clojure's official repo. The > whole history of clojure is a mere 2 megabytes. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
