As with any decision, it will be impossible to please everyone. I think the Git vs Subversion talk is way off topic at this point, but to each his own.
Rich, I think it really depends on what *YOU* want Clojure to be. If you want to take a Haskell like approach and "avoid success at all costs" then I would delay 1.0 for as long as possible. However, if you want to bring on wide adoption, which I think you do, then I think it is *IMPERATIVE* that the front of Stu's book includes the text "Works for Clojure 1.0". It is my opinion that if "Programming Clojure" goes to print without that text Clojure, as a community and a language, loses a lot of potential users! It isn't a big deal to bleeding-edge folks like ourselves, but we are a *MINORITY*. And a minority is all we will be if we think in minor terms. I agree with a lot of what has been said here, but I feel Stu's book release should be at the top of the list. It's Clojure's first impression on the global community of developers, and we all know the rule about first impressions. I vote pragmatism, lets get this sucker rolling! -Ryan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
