On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Apr 16, 12:53 pm, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: >> What does 1.0 mean to you? Are we there yet? Any recommendations for >> the organization of the release branches, patch policy etc? > > I would like to see, concurrent with 1.0, some kind of library > management system. As noted before, contrib is already getting > hairy. We have dozens of little libraries floating around on GitHub. > Having you, Rich, maintain the list of libraries on clojure.org is not > sustainable. We don't need a fully-realized CPAN/RubyGem but we need > something that can scale to a few hundred authors. Dependency > management and documentation markup are components of this.
Python did very well without a CPAN-alike. Of course it had a pretty good standard library. -- Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
