In addition, it's a bad idea to have these two superficially similar functions have the same name, "file". If, in the end, both are to be kept public, then I think they should at least be given different names.
On Apr 6, 10:35 am, Victor Rodriguez <vict...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:06 AM, James Reeves > > <weavejes...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > ... > > The problem with having java-utils/file and duck-streams/file is that > > you lose the ability to load both namespaces at the same time without > > defining an exception for the file function. This does not seem like > > an ideal solution. I think we should choose one or the other, give > > them different names, or attempt to merge their functionality. > > IMHO. what you want to avoid is having similar utility functions in > different projects. Thus, duck-streams could just use the version of > file of java-utils, or keep its own version private. > > Cheers, > > Victor Rodriguez. > > > - James --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
