I'd like it if they were combined. You could then use (file "foo/bar") or (file "foo" "bar").
- James On Apr 5, 9:25 pm, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Doh! Missed that. The duck-streams and java-utils versions of file > have overlapping but disjoint functionality. Other-Stuart, I can take > a look at combining these, or we can just leave them separate for now. > > --Stuart > > > On Apr 5, 5:07 pm, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Never worry about "foo" vs. (File. "foo") again! > > >> (doc file) > >> ------------------------- > >> clojure.contrib.java-utils/file > >> ([arg] [parent child] [parent child & more]) > >> Returns a java.io.File from string or file args. > > >> Notes: > > >> (1) You will need to build contrib from source to see this. > > >> (2) This function is a slight generalization of a similar function in > >> Compojure. James, I am hoping to convince you to make Compojure > >> depend > >> on contrib and start using a standard set of utils. What do you > >> think? > > > There's actually a file in clojure.contrib.duck-streams that's pretty > > similar to this. In fact, I removed the file function from Compojure > > because it clashed with duck-streams :) > > > - James > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
