On Mar 21, 2009, at 11:30 PM, Mark Triggs wrote: >> > > Yep, that's fine. In my case I was actually relying on the fact that > `str' was effectively doing a `prn-str' because I would later read it > back using `read-string' elsewhere. Calling `prn-str' explicitly > isn't a problem--I just thought I'd mention that the semantics have > now changed a little. >
Sorry Mark. I guess I misunderstood what 'prn-str' does. I thought it was for I/O. I missed the print TO string part. Aloha, David Sletten --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
