Those are functions that call booleans as functions. Try this:

(defn simple-true [] true)

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 5:41 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org> wrote:

> Great points!
> They are filled with functions which look like this
>
> (defn simple_true [] (true))
>
> They are not booleans but functions which return a boolean.
> Here is a list of two of those as produced by the code:
>
> (#object[ie4clj.Tests$simple_false 0x3a4621bd
> ie4clj.Tests$simple_false@3a4621bd]
>  #object[ie4clj.Tests$simple_false 0x3a4621bd
> ie4clj.Tests$simple_false@3a4621bd])
>
> Or maybe I missed something.
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 3:33 PM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote:
>
>> Your members list needs to be filled with things that can be called as
>> functions, since that's what that code snippet does, and booleans
>> definitely cannot be called as functions. That's what the error means,
>> there's a boolean in your list and it's trying to cast it to an IFn (a
>> Clojure function interface) when it is called as (member).
>>
>> Can you show the lists you construct? Are they full of functions that
>> take no arguments? Do you want the lists to be able to contain booleans too?
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 2:57 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Cora
>>>
>>> (every? (fn [member] (member)) members)
>>> works fine on [constantly true & false
>>> but fails with
>>> java.lang.Boolean cannot be cast to clojure.lang.IFn
>>> on the lists I construct.
>>>
>>> In truth, I thought all the code was working, but that turned out ot be
>>> an artifact of the test I designed. When I changed the test conditions,
>>> evaluate_and failed.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 5:00 PM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello again Jack,
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 6:21 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> (every? eval members)  does not appear to work on a list of functions
>>>>> designed to evaluate to a boolean.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If members is a list of functions then you would do:
>>>>
>>>> (every? (fn [member] (member)) members)
>>>>
>>>> Showing it work here:
>>>>
>>>> (every? (fn [member] (member)) [(constantly true) (constantly true)])
>>>> ;; => true
>>>> (every? (fn [member] (member)) [(constantly true) (constantly false)])
>>>> ;; => false
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> That code is used in a function evaluateAnd
>>>>>
>>>>> Two simple tests
>>>>> (evaluateAnd [true true] --> true
>>>>> (evaluateAnd [true false] --> nil (why not "false" as the every?
>>>>> examples show?)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In Clojure things are either "truthy" or "falsey", and the only "false"
>>>> values are false and nil so returning nil is usually fine. Everything else
>>>> is "truthy". I wouldn't worry about it returning nil since other things
>>>> were broken anyways.
>>>>
>>>> https://clojure.org/guides/learn/flow#_truth
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The specific code for building the list of functions is this
>>>>>
>>>>> (def x (atom []))
>>>>>   (let [result (list (ref SimpleTrue) (ref SimpleFalse))]
>>>>>     (println "BAL1" result )
>>>>>     (reset! x result)
>>>>>     )
>>>>>   (println "BAL2" @x )
>>>>>
>>>>>   (@x) <<<< returns the atom's value
>>>>>
>>>>> And the final println is this
>>>>>
>>>>> BAL2 (#object[clojure.lang.Ref 0x335b5620 {:status :ready, :val
>>>>> #object[ie4clj.Tests$SimpleTrue 0x6eb2384f 
>>>>> ie4clj.Tests$SimpleTrue@6eb2384f]}]
>>>>> #object[clojure.lang.Ref 0x3c9c0d96 {:status :ready, :val
>>>>> #object[ie4clj.Tests$SimpleFalse 0x31dadd46
>>>>> ie4clj.Tests$SimpleFalse@31dadd46]}])
>>>>>
>>>>> evaluateAnd never saw the result, with this error message
>>>>>
>>>>> clojure.lang.PersistentList cannot be cast to clojure.lang.IFn
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Refs are the wrong thing to use here. In fact I'd stay away from atoms
>>>> and refs unless you have multiple threads that need to mutate the same
>>>> values. They're just confusing things now, I think.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The test which fails is this
>>>>>
>>>>>  (def result (evaluateAnd  (buildAndList) ))  <<< fails here
>>>>>   (println "bar" result)
>>>>>   (result)
>>>>>
>>>>> The googleverse seems to agree that there are extra parens around the
>>>>> value. Google isn't giving me an obvious way to take that value outside of
>>>>> its surrounding parens (bal2 above).
>>>>> Still looking, and hoping that solves the problem.
>>>>> Maybe there's a way to go back to buildAndList and not return the
>>>>> value with parens.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think a key thing to explain is that in Clojure generally you're not
>>>> making new types of collections. There's this famous-ish saying that
>>>> Clojure holds to pretty well:
>>>>
>>>> "It is better to have 100 functions operate on one data structure than
>>>> 10 functions on 10 data structures."
>>>> - Alan Perlis
>>>>
>>>> Most functions in the Clojure world operate on a handful of basic data
>>>> types and structures. This makes it really easy to chain and combine
>>>> functions to slice and dice data since you don't need to convert between
>>>> types.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think I've ever made a special collection type in Clojure, it's
>>>> not all that common. So I'd suggest that while you're at this point in your
>>>> journey you try to stick to the built-in Clojure collection types and use
>>>> the built-in functions to operate on them.
>>>>
>>>> To give you a little direction, instead of a Person object you could
>>>> make a hashmap like {:first-name "Jack" :last-name "Park"} and pass
>>>> that around. And then you can make a function that operates on that.
>>>>
>>>> (defn full-name
>>>>   [person]
>>>>   (str (get person :first-name) " " (get person :last-name)))
>>>>
>>>> And then you could expand that to maybe {:first-name "Jack" :last-name
>>>> "Park" :people-talked-to-on-mailing-list ["Cora Sutton"]} and then
>>>> operate on a collection of people like:
>>>>
>>>> (defn people-talked-to-on-mailing-list
>>>>   [person all-people]
>>>>   (let [people-to-find (set (get person
>>>> :people-talked-to-on-mailing-list))]
>>>>     (filter (fn [p]
>>>>               (people-to-find (full-name p))
>>>>             all-people))
>>>>
>>>> (people-talked-to-on-mailing-list jack all-people)
>>>> ;; => {:first-name "Cora" :last-name "Sutton"
>>>> :people-talked-to-on-mailing-list ["Jack Park"]}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 11:23 AM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jack!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could be wrong but I think this could just be: (every? eval
>>>>>> members)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see a few things here that seem strange to me so I wanted to share
>>>>>> a few points that might be helpful (or might not, let me know either way)
>>>>>> for future code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * So typically you don't want to def or defn within another function
>>>>>> call since that will define a new value at the top level.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (defn foo []
>>>>>>   (def bar 1)
>>>>>>   (println (inc bar))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (foo)
>>>>>> ;; ^^ calling foo will define bar at the top level
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bar
>>>>>> ;; => 1
>>>>>> ;; whoops, didn't mean to have that at the top level like that
>>>>>> ;; imagine if two different threads called that in parallel
>>>>>> ::grimace::
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Instead, you usually want to use the let function:
>>>>>> https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/let
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So in your code you might use this something like:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (let [result (atom true)]
>>>>>>   ....)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The error you're seeing is from the (defn result ...) in your code,
>>>>>> you're missing the argument vector [] after result -- so it would
>>>>>> look like (defn result [] (atom true)) -- but you really don't want
>>>>>> to defn like that, I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * To update an atom's value you don't want to assign like that, you
>>>>>> want to use swap! https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/swap!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (swap! f
>>>>>>        (fn [cur-val new-val] (and cur-val new-val))
>>>>>>        (eval member))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * You probably don't want to use an atom here. Atoms are usually for
>>>>>> data that you intend to have multiple threads accessing. In this case 
>>>>>> it's
>>>>>> just a value that changes during a single thread's execution here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How else could you solve this if not for the very convenient every?
>>>>>> function? There are a bunch of ways! Here are a few, with things written
>>>>>> out pretty explicitly so they're more clear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> loop/recur:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (loop [result true
>>>>>>        remaining-members members]
>>>>>>   (let [member (first remaining-members)
>>>>>>         remaining-members (rest members)
>>>>>>         new-result (eval member)]
>>>>>>     (if new-result
>>>>>>       (recur true remaining-members)
>>>>>>       false)))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> reduce v1:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (reduce (fn [result member]
>>>>>>           (and result
>>>>>>                (eval member)))
>>>>>>         true
>>>>>>         members)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> reduce v2.0, that will now stop iterating once one of the members
>>>>>> evals to false:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (reduce (fn [_ member]
>>>>>>           (or (eval member)
>>>>>>               (reduced false)))
>>>>>>         true
>>>>>>         members)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My point with sharing these is that in clojure usually the best way
>>>>>> to solve these problems is to pass new values to the next iteration while
>>>>>> accumulating a result instead of changing a variable on each iteration. 
>>>>>> Or
>>>>>> to use one of these sweet built-in functions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does that make sense?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * I thiiiiiiink you might not mean eval but I'm interested in what
>>>>>> kind of problem you're solving! :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope that helps!
>>>>>> Cora
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 12:41 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a class which treats a sequence as a conjunctive list of
>>>>>>> objects which, when evaluated, return a boolean.  It is an attempt to 
>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>> doseq to walk along that list, evaluating each entry, and anding that
>>>>>>> result with  boolean atom. It fails. A sketch of the code is this - 
>>>>>>> taken
>>>>>>> from the error message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> inside (defn AndList...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (reify
>>>>>>>     ie4clj.api.Inferrable
>>>>>>>     (defn evalMembers
>>>>>>>         [members]
>>>>>>>         (defn result (atom true))
>>>>>>>         (doseq [x members]
>>>>>>>             (result = (and result (eval x))))
>>>>>>>         (println (clojure.core/deref result))
>>>>>>>     (result))) - *failed: vector? at: [:fn-tail :arity-1 :params]
>>>>>>> spec: :clojure.core.specs.alpha/param-list*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It could be that my Java background is clouding my use of clojure.
>>>>>>> Any comments will be appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Jack
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/f67cfcd0-8e1e-4780-bc00-f6993979e7afn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/f67cfcd0-8e1e-4780-bc00-f6993979e7afn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BWybiXzgoYaKK958z%2BWqTKf0o_5p9fq-huwutco9onw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BWybiXzgoYaKK958z%2BWqTKf0o_5p9fq-huwutco9onw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fwv-rKrWnXji_r4scaX9_jtAi1CRUWGLLNRj7iZtme4UA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fwv-rKrWnXji_r4scaX9_jtAi1CRUWGLLNRj7iZtme4UA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 6:21 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> (every? eval members)  does not appear to work on a list of functions
>>>>> designed to evaluate to a boolean.
>>>>>
>>>>> That code is used in a function evaluateAnd
>>>>>
>>>>> Two simple tests
>>>>> (evaluateAnd [true true] --> true
>>>>> (evaluateAnd [true false] --> nil (why not "false" as the every?
>>>>> examples show?)
>>>>>
>>>>> The specific code for building the list of functions is this
>>>>>
>>>>> (def x (atom []))
>>>>>   (let [result (list (ref SimpleTrue) (ref SimpleFalse))]
>>>>>     (println "BAL1" result )
>>>>>     (reset! x result)
>>>>>     )
>>>>>   (println "BAL2" @x )
>>>>>
>>>>>   (@x) <<<< returns the atom's value
>>>>>
>>>>> And the final println is this
>>>>>
>>>>> BAL2 (#object[clojure.lang.Ref 0x335b5620 {:status :ready, :val
>>>>> #object[ie4clj.Tests$SimpleTrue 0x6eb2384f 
>>>>> ie4clj.Tests$SimpleTrue@6eb2384f]}]
>>>>> #object[clojure.lang.Ref 0x3c9c0d96 {:status :ready, :val
>>>>> #object[ie4clj.Tests$SimpleFalse 0x31dadd46
>>>>> ie4clj.Tests$SimpleFalse@31dadd46]}])
>>>>>
>>>>> evaluateAnd never saw the result, with this error message
>>>>>
>>>>> clojure.lang.PersistentList cannot be cast to clojure.lang.IFn
>>>>>
>>>>> The test which fails is this
>>>>>
>>>>>  (def result (evaluateAnd  (buildAndList) ))  <<< fails here
>>>>>   (println "bar" result)
>>>>>   (result)
>>>>>
>>>>> The googleverse seems to agree that there are extra parens around the
>>>>> value. Google isn't giving me an obvious way to take that value outside of
>>>>> its surrounding parens (bal2 above).
>>>>> Still looking, and hoping that solves the problem.
>>>>> Maybe there's a way to go back to buildAndList and not return the
>>>>> value with parens.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 11:23 AM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jack!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could be wrong but I think this could just be: (every? eval
>>>>>> members)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see a few things here that seem strange to me so I wanted to share
>>>>>> a few points that might be helpful (or might not, let me know either way)
>>>>>> for future code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * So typically you don't want to def or defn within another function
>>>>>> call since that will define a new value at the top level.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (defn foo []
>>>>>>   (def bar 1)
>>>>>>   (println (inc bar))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (foo)
>>>>>> ;; ^^ calling foo will define bar at the top level
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bar
>>>>>> ;; => 1
>>>>>> ;; whoops, didn't mean to have that at the top level like that
>>>>>> ;; imagine if two different threads called that in parallel
>>>>>> ::grimace::
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Instead, you usually want to use the let function:
>>>>>> https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/let
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So in your code you might use this something like:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (let [result (atom true)]
>>>>>>   ....)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The error you're seeing is from the (defn result ...) in your code,
>>>>>> you're missing the argument vector [] after result -- so it would
>>>>>> look like (defn result [] (atom true)) -- but you really don't want
>>>>>> to defn like that, I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * To update an atom's value you don't want to assign like that, you
>>>>>> want to use swap! https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/swap!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (swap! f
>>>>>>        (fn [cur-val new-val] (and cur-val new-val))
>>>>>>        (eval member))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * You probably don't want to use an atom here. Atoms are usually for
>>>>>> data that you intend to have multiple threads accessing. In this case 
>>>>>> it's
>>>>>> just a value that changes during a single thread's execution here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How else could you solve this if not for the very convenient every?
>>>>>> function? There are a bunch of ways! Here are a few, with things written
>>>>>> out pretty explicitly so they're more clear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> loop/recur:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (loop [result true
>>>>>>        remaining-members members]
>>>>>>   (let [member (first remaining-members)
>>>>>>         remaining-members (rest members)
>>>>>>         new-result (eval member)]
>>>>>>     (if new-result
>>>>>>       (recur true remaining-members)
>>>>>>       false)))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> reduce v1:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (reduce (fn [result member]
>>>>>>           (and result
>>>>>>                (eval member)))
>>>>>>         true
>>>>>>         members)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> reduce v2.0, that will now stop iterating once one of the members
>>>>>> evals to false:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (reduce (fn [_ member]
>>>>>>           (or (eval member)
>>>>>>               (reduced false)))
>>>>>>         true
>>>>>>         members)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My point with sharing these is that in clojure usually the best way
>>>>>> to solve these problems is to pass new values to the next iteration while
>>>>>> accumulating a result instead of changing a variable on each iteration. 
>>>>>> Or
>>>>>> to use one of these sweet built-in functions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does that make sense?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * I thiiiiiiink you might not mean eval but I'm interested in what
>>>>>> kind of problem you're solving! :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope that helps!
>>>>>> Cora
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 12:41 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a class which treats a sequence as a conjunctive list of
>>>>>>> objects which, when evaluated, return a boolean.  It is an attempt to 
>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>> doseq to walk along that list, evaluating each entry, and anding that
>>>>>>> result with  boolean atom. It fails. A sketch of the code is this - 
>>>>>>> taken
>>>>>>> from the error message:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> inside (defn AndList...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (reify
>>>>>>>     ie4clj.api.Inferrable
>>>>>>>     (defn evalMembers
>>>>>>>         [members]
>>>>>>>         (defn result (atom true))
>>>>>>>         (doseq [x members]
>>>>>>>             (result = (and result (eval x))))
>>>>>>>         (println (clojure.core/deref result))
>>>>>>>     (result))) - *failed: vector? at: [:fn-tail :arity-1 :params]
>>>>>>> spec: :clojure.core.specs.alpha/param-list*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It could be that my Java background is clouding my use of clojure.
>>>>>>> Any comments will be appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Jack
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/f67cfcd0-8e1e-4780-bc00-f6993979e7afn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/f67cfcd0-8e1e-4780-bc00-f6993979e7afn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BWybiXzgoYaKK958z%2BWqTKf0o_5p9fq-huwutco9onw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BWybiXzgoYaKK958z%2BWqTKf0o_5p9fq-huwutco9onw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fwv-rKrWnXji_r4scaX9_jtAi1CRUWGLLNRj7iZtme4UA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fwv-rKrWnXji_r4scaX9_jtAi1CRUWGLLNRj7iZtme4UA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>>> your first post.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY1wvo_N32dKV1g-9cZAmTbZUO5bRAXDGkdHm-7_VD_-Rg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY1wvo_N32dKV1g-9cZAmTbZUO5bRAXDGkdHm-7_VD_-Rg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fyc%2BctV%2B1OgzWRYLsWevL97ouVkS1FGf0uGFtTcznRjUg%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fyc%2BctV%2B1OgzWRYLsWevL97ouVkS1FGf0uGFtTcznRjUg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY0qvUUrTmQtfcUocwWbr50juXzoZt%3DSmPr%3D0o%3DgRXoM2A%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY0qvUUrTmQtfcUocwWbr50juXzoZt%3DSmPr%3D0o%3DgRXoM2A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fxJXPC8Y%3DY_UEAsAyMek4FZwo%2BP9bVahzrVKQLKGd%3D3Lg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fxJXPC8Y%3DY_UEAsAyMek4FZwo%2BP9bVahzrVKQLKGd%3D3Lg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BKpWAu6%3D%2BEC6o3PSGg7CXETgyZymOBKLnhEJYG7UVdQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to