I think you forgot to link it, but I think I found it
<https://gist.github.com/KnowledgeGarden/572ab649c9266e0f804c93ff4ba2c43c>
 :)

You don't really need line 11. It will run without it.
Don't use defs inside a function. Use let. Always.
Don't use atoms inside a function. In fact, unless you need some shared
state between processes - just don't use them. Same goes for refs.

(I changed the name of function to be more clojure like (ie: SimpleTrue ->
simple-true and so on)

It's not clear what you want to do with the SimpleTrue, SimpleFalse. Do you
need it to be a list? Or a boolean value?
If boolean - then do this:

(defn simple-true [] true)
(defn simple-false [] false)
(defn not-simple-true [] (not simple-true))
(defn not-simple-false [] (not simple-false))

If you need a list, just do:

(defn simple-true [] '(true)) ;<--- notice the quote before the parenthesis
(defn simple-true [] [true]) ; or just use vectors

In clojure, if you need lists, always put a quote before the parenthesis,
otherwise it will be interpreted as a function.
So (true) will throw an exception, but '(true) will work:

ie4clj.core=> (true)
Execution error (ClassCastException) at ie4clj.core/eval1490
(form-init3173779095201492457.clj:1).
java.lang.Boolean cannot be cast to clojure.lang.IFn

ie4clj.core=> '(true)
(true)


Another place where it will throw an error is line 41

(@x)

Do you want to return the result as a list or just return the result?
If you want a list you do this:

'(@x) ; <-- notice the quote
[@x] ; or use vector

If you want to return a result just do this:

@x

Also, don't use atoms )

On line 37 you are assigning the result of let to that atom, BAL2 will be
the same as BAL1, so you can just skip it and return the result from let.
Like this:

(defn build-and-list []
  (println "BAL")
  (let [result (flatten (list simple-true simple-false))] ;<--
actually not sure if this is the thing you want here. This will be a
list of functions.
    (println "BAL1" result )
    result))


Another thing is with the test function. Don't use defs there, just use a
let clause, like this:

(defn first-test []
  (println "First Test")
  (let [x (evaluate-and [(constantly true) (constantly true)])
        y (evaluate-and [(constantly true) (constantly false)])
        l (build-and-list)
        result (evaluate-and l)]
    (println "A" x)
    (println "B" y)
    (println "C" l)
    (println "bar" result)
    result))

And here is the evaluate-and function with let instead of def.

(defn evaluate-and
  [members]
  (println "EA" members)
  (let [result (every?  (fn [member] (member)) members)]
    (println "EA+" result)
    result)) ;<-- I added this line, as (println) one return nil, and
I thought you needed the result true or false (?)

This compiles and runs for me (unless I forgot something). (if it doesn't
just tell me, I'll commit the code so you can play with it)


On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 05:16, Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org> wrote:

> Cora, I agree. A gist was just submitted here. I'm in the clojurians
> slack; I have a weak memory of being there once before. But, happy to put a
> summary of this in #beginners as you suggest.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 8:13 PM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote:
>
>> Code would be helpful for sure! Also, it might be time to move this to
>> Clojurians Slack http://clojurians.net/
>>
>> There is a #beginners channel where volunteers are available to help in a
>> more synchronous fashion which might help get to the bottom of this a bit
>> quicker.
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 10:00 PM Tanya Moldovan <tanya.moldo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> Could you share the code you have now?
>>>
>>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, 02:18 Jack Park, <jackp...@topicquests.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cora!
>>>>
>>>> I made those changes. It is still working to the degree it was, with
>>>> the same error
>>>> clojure.lang.LazySeq cannot be cast to clojure.lang.IFn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> which, according to the intertubes, means that my buildAndList returns
>>>> (value) instead of value. I tried flatten. No cigar.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Jack
>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 5:00 PM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello again Jack,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 6:21 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> (every? eval members)  does not appear to work on a list of functions
>>>>>> designed to evaluate to a boolean.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If members is a list of functions then you would do:
>>>>>
>>>>> (every? (fn [member] (member)) members)
>>>>>
>>>>> Showing it work here:
>>>>>
>>>>> (every? (fn [member] (member)) [(constantly true) (constantly true)])
>>>>> ;; => true
>>>>> (every? (fn [member] (member)) [(constantly true) (constantly false)])
>>>>> ;; => false
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> That code is used in a function evaluateAnd
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Two simple tests
>>>>>> (evaluateAnd [true true] --> true
>>>>>> (evaluateAnd [true false] --> nil (why not "false" as the every?
>>>>>> examples show?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In Clojure things are either "truthy" or "falsey", and the only
>>>>> "false" values are false and nil so returning nil is usually fine.
>>>>> Everything else is "truthy". I wouldn't worry about it returning nil since
>>>>> other things were broken anyways.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://clojure.org/guides/learn/flow#_truth
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> The specific code for building the list of functions is this
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (def x (atom []))
>>>>>>   (let [result (list (ref SimpleTrue) (ref SimpleFalse))]
>>>>>>     (println "BAL1" result )
>>>>>>     (reset! x result)
>>>>>>     )
>>>>>>   (println "BAL2" @x )
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   (@x) <<<< returns the atom's value
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And the final println is this
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BAL2 (#object[clojure.lang.Ref 0x335b5620 {:status :ready, :val
>>>>>> #object[ie4clj.Tests$SimpleTrue 0x6eb2384f 
>>>>>> ie4clj.Tests$SimpleTrue@6eb2384f]}]
>>>>>> #object[clojure.lang.Ref 0x3c9c0d96 {:status :ready, :val
>>>>>> #object[ie4clj.Tests$SimpleFalse 0x31dadd46
>>>>>> ie4clj.Tests$SimpleFalse@31dadd46]}])
>>>>>>
>>>>>> evaluateAnd never saw the result, with this error message
>>>>>>
>>>>>> clojure.lang.PersistentList cannot be cast to clojure.lang.IFn
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Refs are the wrong thing to use here. In fact I'd stay away from atoms
>>>>> and refs unless you have multiple threads that need to mutate the same
>>>>> values. They're just confusing things now, I think.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The test which fails is this
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  (def result (evaluateAnd  (buildAndList) ))  <<< fails here
>>>>>>   (println "bar" result)
>>>>>>   (result)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The googleverse seems to agree that there are extra parens around the
>>>>>> value. Google isn't giving me an obvious way to take that value outside 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> its surrounding parens (bal2 above).
>>>>>> Still looking, and hoping that solves the problem.
>>>>>> Maybe there's a way to go back to buildAndList and not return the
>>>>>> value with parens.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think a key thing to explain is that in Clojure generally you're not
>>>>> making new types of collections. There's this famous-ish saying that
>>>>> Clojure holds to pretty well:
>>>>>
>>>>> "It is better to have 100 functions operate on one data structure than
>>>>> 10 functions on 10 data structures."
>>>>> - Alan Perlis
>>>>>
>>>>> Most functions in the Clojure world operate on a handful of basic data
>>>>> types and structures. This makes it really easy to chain and combine
>>>>> functions to slice and dice data since you don't need to convert between
>>>>> types.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think I've ever made a special collection type in Clojure,
>>>>> it's not all that common. So I'd suggest that while you're at this point 
>>>>> in
>>>>> your journey you try to stick to the built-in Clojure collection types and
>>>>> use the built-in functions to operate on them.
>>>>>
>>>>> To give you a little direction, instead of a Person object you could
>>>>> make a hashmap like {:first-name "Jack" :last-name "Park"} and pass
>>>>> that around. And then you can make a function that operates on that.
>>>>>
>>>>> (defn full-name
>>>>>   [person]
>>>>>   (str (get person :first-name) " " (get person :last-name)))
>>>>>
>>>>> And then you could expand that to maybe {:first-name "Jack"
>>>>> :last-name "Park" :people-talked-to-on-mailing-list ["Cora Sutton"]} and
>>>>> then operate on a collection of people like:
>>>>>
>>>>> (defn people-talked-to-on-mailing-list
>>>>>   [person all-people]
>>>>>   (let [people-to-find (set (get person
>>>>> :people-talked-to-on-mailing-list))]
>>>>>     (filter (fn [p]
>>>>>               (people-to-find (full-name p))
>>>>>             all-people))
>>>>>
>>>>> (people-talked-to-on-mailing-list jack all-people)
>>>>> ;; => {:first-name "Cora" :last-name "Sutton"
>>>>> :people-talked-to-on-mailing-list ["Jack Park"]}
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 11:23 AM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jack!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I could be wrong but I think this could just be: (every? eval
>>>>>>> members)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see a few things here that seem strange to me so I wanted to share
>>>>>>> a few points that might be helpful (or might not, let me know either 
>>>>>>> way)
>>>>>>> for future code.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * So typically you don't want to def or defn within another function
>>>>>>> call since that will define a new value at the top level.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (defn foo []
>>>>>>>   (def bar 1)
>>>>>>>   (println (inc bar))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (foo)
>>>>>>> ;; ^^ calling foo will define bar at the top level
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bar
>>>>>>> ;; => 1
>>>>>>> ;; whoops, didn't mean to have that at the top level like that
>>>>>>> ;; imagine if two different threads called that in parallel
>>>>>>> ::grimace::
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Instead, you usually want to use the let function:
>>>>>>> https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/let
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So in your code you might use this something like:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (let [result (atom true)]
>>>>>>>   ....)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The error you're seeing is from the (defn result ...) in your code,
>>>>>>> you're missing the argument vector [] after result -- so it would
>>>>>>> look like (defn result [] (atom true)) -- but you really don't want
>>>>>>> to defn like that, I think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * To update an atom's value you don't want to assign like that, you
>>>>>>> want to use swap! https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/swap!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (swap! f
>>>>>>>        (fn [cur-val new-val] (and cur-val new-val))
>>>>>>>        (eval member))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * You probably don't want to use an atom here. Atoms are usually for
>>>>>>> data that you intend to have multiple threads accessing. In this case 
>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>> just a value that changes during a single thread's execution here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How else could you solve this if not for the very convenient every?
>>>>>>> function? There are a bunch of ways! Here are a few, with things written
>>>>>>> out pretty explicitly so they're more clear.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> loop/recur:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (loop [result true
>>>>>>>        remaining-members members]
>>>>>>>   (let [member (first remaining-members)
>>>>>>>         remaining-members (rest members)
>>>>>>>         new-result (eval member)]
>>>>>>>     (if new-result
>>>>>>>       (recur true remaining-members)
>>>>>>>       false)))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reduce v1:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (reduce (fn [result member]
>>>>>>>           (and result
>>>>>>>                (eval member)))
>>>>>>>         true
>>>>>>>         members)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reduce v2.0, that will now stop iterating once one of the members
>>>>>>> evals to false:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (reduce (fn [_ member]
>>>>>>>           (or (eval member)
>>>>>>>               (reduced false)))
>>>>>>>         true
>>>>>>>         members)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My point with sharing these is that in clojure usually the best way
>>>>>>> to solve these problems is to pass new values to the next iteration 
>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>> accumulating a result instead of changing a variable on each iteration. 
>>>>>>> Or
>>>>>>> to use one of these sweet built-in functions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does that make sense?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * I thiiiiiiink you might not mean eval but I'm interested in what
>>>>>>> kind of problem you're solving! :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hope that helps!
>>>>>>> Cora
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 12:41 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have a class which treats a sequence as a conjunctive list of
>>>>>>>> objects which, when evaluated, return a boolean.  It is an attempt to 
>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>> doseq to walk along that list, evaluating each entry, and anding that
>>>>>>>> result with  boolean atom. It fails. A sketch of the code is this - 
>>>>>>>> taken
>>>>>>>> from the error message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> inside (defn AndList...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (reify
>>>>>>>>     ie4clj.api.Inferrable
>>>>>>>>     (defn evalMembers
>>>>>>>>         [members]
>>>>>>>>         (defn result (atom true))
>>>>>>>>         (doseq [x members]
>>>>>>>>             (result = (and result (eval x))))
>>>>>>>>         (println (clojure.core/deref result))
>>>>>>>>     (result))) - *failed: vector? at: [:fn-tail :arity-1 :params]
>>>>>>>> spec: :clojure.core.specs.alpha/param-list*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It could be that my Java background is clouding my use of clojure.
>>>>>>>> Any comments will be appreciated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> Jack
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/f67cfcd0-8e1e-4780-bc00-f6993979e7afn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/f67cfcd0-8e1e-4780-bc00-f6993979e7afn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BWybiXzgoYaKK958z%2BWqTKf0o_5p9fq-huwutco9onw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BWybiXzgoYaKK958z%2BWqTKf0o_5p9fq-huwutco9onw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fwv-rKrWnXji_r4scaX9_jtAi1CRUWGLLNRj7iZtme4UA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fwv-rKrWnXji_r4scaX9_jtAi1CRUWGLLNRj7iZtme4UA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 6:21 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> (every? eval members)  does not appear to work on a list of functions
>>>>>> designed to evaluate to a boolean.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That code is used in a function evaluateAnd
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Two simple tests
>>>>>> (evaluateAnd [true true] --> true
>>>>>> (evaluateAnd [true false] --> nil (why not "false" as the every?
>>>>>> examples show?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The specific code for building the list of functions is this
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (def x (atom []))
>>>>>>   (let [result (list (ref SimpleTrue) (ref SimpleFalse))]
>>>>>>     (println "BAL1" result )
>>>>>>     (reset! x result)
>>>>>>     )
>>>>>>   (println "BAL2" @x )
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   (@x) <<<< returns the atom's value
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And the final println is this
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BAL2 (#object[clojure.lang.Ref 0x335b5620 {:status :ready, :val
>>>>>> #object[ie4clj.Tests$SimpleTrue 0x6eb2384f 
>>>>>> ie4clj.Tests$SimpleTrue@6eb2384f]}]
>>>>>> #object[clojure.lang.Ref 0x3c9c0d96 {:status :ready, :val
>>>>>> #object[ie4clj.Tests$SimpleFalse 0x31dadd46
>>>>>> ie4clj.Tests$SimpleFalse@31dadd46]}])
>>>>>>
>>>>>> evaluateAnd never saw the result, with this error message
>>>>>>
>>>>>> clojure.lang.PersistentList cannot be cast to clojure.lang.IFn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The test which fails is this
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  (def result (evaluateAnd  (buildAndList) ))  <<< fails here
>>>>>>   (println "bar" result)
>>>>>>   (result)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The googleverse seems to agree that there are extra parens around the
>>>>>> value. Google isn't giving me an obvious way to take that value outside 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> its surrounding parens (bal2 above).
>>>>>> Still looking, and hoping that solves the problem.
>>>>>> Maybe there's a way to go back to buildAndList and not return the
>>>>>> value with parens.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 11:23 AM Cora Sutton <c...@sutton.me> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jack!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I could be wrong but I think this could just be: (every? eval
>>>>>>> members)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see a few things here that seem strange to me so I wanted to share
>>>>>>> a few points that might be helpful (or might not, let me know either 
>>>>>>> way)
>>>>>>> for future code.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * So typically you don't want to def or defn within another function
>>>>>>> call since that will define a new value at the top level.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (defn foo []
>>>>>>>   (def bar 1)
>>>>>>>   (println (inc bar))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (foo)
>>>>>>> ;; ^^ calling foo will define bar at the top level
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bar
>>>>>>> ;; => 1
>>>>>>> ;; whoops, didn't mean to have that at the top level like that
>>>>>>> ;; imagine if two different threads called that in parallel
>>>>>>> ::grimace::
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Instead, you usually want to use the let function:
>>>>>>> https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/let
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So in your code you might use this something like:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (let [result (atom true)]
>>>>>>>   ....)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The error you're seeing is from the (defn result ...) in your code,
>>>>>>> you're missing the argument vector [] after result -- so it would
>>>>>>> look like (defn result [] (atom true)) -- but you really don't want
>>>>>>> to defn like that, I think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * To update an atom's value you don't want to assign like that, you
>>>>>>> want to use swap! https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/swap!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (swap! f
>>>>>>>        (fn [cur-val new-val] (and cur-val new-val))
>>>>>>>        (eval member))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * You probably don't want to use an atom here. Atoms are usually for
>>>>>>> data that you intend to have multiple threads accessing. In this case 
>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>> just a value that changes during a single thread's execution here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How else could you solve this if not for the very convenient every?
>>>>>>> function? There are a bunch of ways! Here are a few, with things written
>>>>>>> out pretty explicitly so they're more clear.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> loop/recur:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (loop [result true
>>>>>>>        remaining-members members]
>>>>>>>   (let [member (first remaining-members)
>>>>>>>         remaining-members (rest members)
>>>>>>>         new-result (eval member)]
>>>>>>>     (if new-result
>>>>>>>       (recur true remaining-members)
>>>>>>>       false)))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reduce v1:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (reduce (fn [result member]
>>>>>>>           (and result
>>>>>>>                (eval member)))
>>>>>>>         true
>>>>>>>         members)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reduce v2.0, that will now stop iterating once one of the members
>>>>>>> evals to false:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (reduce (fn [_ member]
>>>>>>>           (or (eval member)
>>>>>>>               (reduced false)))
>>>>>>>         true
>>>>>>>         members)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My point with sharing these is that in clojure usually the best way
>>>>>>> to solve these problems is to pass new values to the next iteration 
>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>> accumulating a result instead of changing a variable on each iteration. 
>>>>>>> Or
>>>>>>> to use one of these sweet built-in functions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does that make sense?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * I thiiiiiiink you might not mean eval but I'm interested in what
>>>>>>> kind of problem you're solving! :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hope that helps!
>>>>>>> Cora
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 12:41 PM Jack Park <jackp...@topicquests.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have a class which treats a sequence as a conjunctive list of
>>>>>>>> objects which, when evaluated, return a boolean.  It is an attempt to 
>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>> doseq to walk along that list, evaluating each entry, and anding that
>>>>>>>> result with  boolean atom. It fails. A sketch of the code is this - 
>>>>>>>> taken
>>>>>>>> from the error message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> inside (defn AndList...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (reify
>>>>>>>>     ie4clj.api.Inferrable
>>>>>>>>     (defn evalMembers
>>>>>>>>         [members]
>>>>>>>>         (defn result (atom true))
>>>>>>>>         (doseq [x members]
>>>>>>>>             (result = (and result (eval x))))
>>>>>>>>         (println (clojure.core/deref result))
>>>>>>>>     (result))) - *failed: vector? at: [:fn-tail :arity-1 :params]
>>>>>>>> spec: :clojure.core.specs.alpha/param-list*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It could be that my Java background is clouding my use of clojure.
>>>>>>>> Any comments will be appreciated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> Jack
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/f67cfcd0-8e1e-4780-bc00-f6993979e7afn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/f67cfcd0-8e1e-4780-bc00-f6993979e7afn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BWybiXzgoYaKK958z%2BWqTKf0o_5p9fq-huwutco9onw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY3BWybiXzgoYaKK958z%2BWqTKf0o_5p9fq-huwutco9onw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fwv-rKrWnXji_r4scaX9_jtAi1CRUWGLLNRj7iZtme4UA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fwv-rKrWnXji_r4scaX9_jtAi1CRUWGLLNRj7iZtme4UA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY1wvo_N32dKV1g-9cZAmTbZUO5bRAXDGkdHm-7_VD_-Rg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY1wvo_N32dKV1g-9cZAmTbZUO5bRAXDGkdHm-7_VD_-Rg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>>> your first post.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fzjBE_F8%2BZ0fR69_1%3DWGs%3Duy5oJ3aGouYAmeQK9vRx6DA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fzjBE_F8%2BZ0fR69_1%3DWGs%3Duy5oJ3aGouYAmeQK9vRx6DA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CADBYUPta6ZJf1gWCFq0L236aOZm077YeRrVqOxnfov%2Bk%2BjcZuQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CADBYUPta6ZJf1gWCFq0L236aOZm077YeRrVqOxnfov%2Bk%2BjcZuQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY2EUs9Y3xHtnZM4HkjnnuQG0jvmvmRrY-uVkDENvj9AQA%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAMZDCY2EUs9Y3xHtnZM4HkjnnuQG0jvmvmRrY-uVkDENvj9AQA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fx6qEFtBP8Xbtq5aDYx-ujBydeLto3pxv%3Dq9O_Y6k5A3A%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAH6s0fx6qEFtBP8Xbtq5aDYx-ujBydeLto3pxv%3Dq9O_Y6k5A3A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CADBYUPs5cFVjCtmzfBr8gwnOESKr07%2BXYEzMvcNewLnAoDO7rA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to