That's a great idea. I guess the easiest way to implement this is to make it standard to include tags: at the top or bottom of a docstring:
(defn pmap "tags: parallel, map Blah blah blah." ...) (find-doc "parallel") --- (pmap ...) tags: parallel, map Blah blah blah. That'd be a cool, useful, easy, and, to my knowledge, unique little convention. It'd solve the problem of having to include common synonyms for people searching with find-doc. I hope that the core API would implement this. On Mar 9, 5:53 am, Mark Volkmann <r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Tuomas J. Lukka <tuomas.lu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > In fact, how about adding tags to the actual docstrings of the > > functions? That way, this could be automatized in the future. > > I suggested that a couple of months ago and didn't get any feedback. I > agree it would be a nice thing to do. Imagine being in a REPL and > having to ability to enter something like (forms "logical") and > getting back (and every? not not-any? not-every? or some). > > -- > R. Mark Volkmann > Object Computing, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---