On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Tuomas J. Lukka <tuomas.lu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In fact, how about adding tags to the actual docstrings of the > functions? That way, this could be automatized in the future.
I suggested that a couple of months ago and didn't get any feedback. I agree it would be a nice thing to do. Imagine being in a REPL and having to ability to enter something like (forms "logical") and getting back (and every? not not-any? not-every? or some). -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
