Hello,
2009/3/6 Ilya Sergey <[email protected]>
>
> Hello.
>
> Look at last plugin version. I've changed rules for indentation and
> alignment in Clojure files. Now all forms inside function call are
> aligned by its _second_ elemnt, i. e. first argument as in the
> following example:
>
> (defn select-keys
> "Returns a map containing only those entries in map whose key is in
> keys"
> [map keyseq]
> (loop [ret {} keys (seq keyseq)]
> (if keys
> (let [entry (. clojure.lang.RT (find map (first keys)))]
> (recur
> (if entry
> (conj ret entry)
> ret)
> (rest keys)))
> ret)))
In conventional clojure formatting (if such a statement can be made for
clojure), shouldn't the if following the loop be indented just 2 spaces
deeper than loop ? (same question for the let after the if, and the recur
after the let ?
?
Regards,
--
Laurent
>
>
> So, all argument forms in function call are aligned. If first element
> of a list is not symbol, then alignment is performed by its offset:
>
> (defn str
> "With no args, returns the empty string. With one arg x, returns
> x.toString(). (str nil) returns the empty string. With more than
> one arg, returns the concatenation of the str values of the args."
> {:tag String}
> ([] "")
> ([#^Object x]
> (if (nil? x) "" (. x (toString))))
> ([x & ys]
> ((fn [#^StringBuilder sb more]
> (if more
> (recur (. sb (append (str (first more)))) (rest more))
> (str sb)))
> (new StringBuilder #^String (str x)) ys)))
>
>
> With best regards,
> Ilya
> - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -
>
> On Mar 2, 2:05 am, Asbjørn Bjørnstad <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm not an Intellij user, but:
> >
> > On Mar 2, 2:22 am, CuppoJava <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > After using La Clojure a bit more, I noticed a few minor issues with
> > > the indentation system.
> >
> > > Inside a let form binding, the next line should be indented to one
> > > character past the opening bracket.
> >
> > > eg. should be like:
> > > (let [i "hi"
> > > j "hi"])
> > > where j lines up with i.
> >
> > Agree on this.
> >
> > > Also
> > > Nested forms, IMO, should be indented to be two spaces past the last
> > > opening parenthesis.
> >
> > > eg. should be like:
> > > (let [i (fn [a]
> > > (println a))]
> >
> > That's three spaces...
> >
> > I'd say use the common indentation rules, which I thought was on space
> > past the last opening parenthesis. But I just looked at one of the
> > source files, and it's not consistent.
> >
> > When a pretty-printer is in place, I guess that could become the
> > definition of the indentation rules.
> > --
> > -asbjxrn
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
