While I'm fairly new to clojure, and with apologies to Stewart Halloway for complicating his job on the book, (which is excellent so far, btw) I think it would be worth while to chose the optimum naming convention, if it can be done fast enough to update the book. Consider how long some warts had been around before Python 3 removed them, we're going to have to deal with these things for a long time...
That said, having the book fall out of compliance with clojure would be REALLY bad. I had that experience with "The Definitive Guide to Django", which wasn't, and it really turned me off. (The fact that people made snarky comments on IRC when I asked why things didn't work didn't help either; after a change like this you can't just tell people to RTFM.) ~Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
