> > Maybe _ is appropriate? > > => (let-> _ (+ 1 2) (* 2 _) (+ _ 1)) > 7 > => (let-> _ [1 2 3] (map inc _) (reduce + _) (+ _ 3)) > 12 > > Or maybe ? ?
Don't forget the wide variety of unicode symbols you have at your disposal: user=> (let-> ★ 2 (+ ★ 3) (- 10 ★ ) (map #(* ★ %) [2 3 4])) (10 15 20) Perfectly valid. Hard to miss that. (It is a star glyph incase this doesn't come across). Of course, this is matter of style and I would not want to enforce a specific character. Also, doing so could lead to unhygienic clashes of a nasty sort. -M --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
