Thanks !
On 10 fév, 00:36, Timothy Pratley <timothyprat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Will i get used to the nested 'if' blocks someday ? Any way to write
> > the equivalent of a switch case here, if only to improve
> > readibility ?
>
> You could use cond:
>
> (cond
> (not (blocked? screen new_x new_y)) [(assoc player :y new_y) true]
> (not (blocked? screen new_x (player :y)) [(assoc player :x new_x)
> true]
> (not (blocked? screen (player :x) new_y) [(assoc player :y new_y)
> true]
> :else [player false])
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
