On Jan 21, 5:02 pm, Jon Harrop <j...@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2009 21:41:29 Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> > This issue (TCO) is resolved - it's a limitation of the JVM that
> > Clojure accepts. If that is a significant problem for anyone they
> > should either not use Clojure or work on adding TCO to the JVM via the
> > MLVM effort:
>
> >http://openjdk.java.net/projects/mlvm/
>
> Too late:
>
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/2009-January/000331.html
>
I saw that too, very promising. Someone's working on continuations as
well.
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
