On Jan 20, 4:21 pm, "Mark H." <mark.hoem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 20, 9:31 am, Jon Harrop <j...@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 20 January 2009 08:01:19 ivant wrote:
>
> > > IIRC, the only major complain Rich has about JVM is the lack
> > > of tail-call optimization.
>
> > That's a pretty major problem. :-)
>
> btw, did you ever stop trolling comp.lang.lisp? You were the main
> reason I figured out how to filter individual names out of a Google
> Groups feed ;-P
>
Let's keep from making the same mistakes as c.l.l, including calling
people trolls.
This issue (TCO) is resolved - it's a limitation of the JVM that
Clojure accepts. If that is a significant problem for anyone they
should either not use Clojure or work on adding TCO to the JVM via the
MLVM effort:
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/mlvm/
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
