On Dec 5, 9:07 am, Meikel Brandmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5 Dez., 15:03, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's true. However, with Clojure now having a specific meaning for
> > "atom" that's different from that of the larger Lisp world, I'm
> > wondering if it would be a good idea to remove atom? from pred.clj.
>
> > Feedback welcome.
>
> I would think so. Or come up with a different name.
> non-coll? ?
>
We have complement and not. Do we need non-xxx? versions of all the
predicates? I don't think non-coll? is special.
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
