On Dec 5, 2008, at 8:50 AM, Mark McGranaghan wrote: > This is indeed the definition used in the clojure.contrib.pred > library: > http://github.com/kevinoneill/clojure-contrib/tree/master/src/clojure/contrib/pred.clj#L45
That's true. However, with Clojure now having a specific meaning for "atom" that's different from that of the larger Lisp world, I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to remove atom? from pred.clj. Feedback welcome. --Steve --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
