Hi, On 5 Dez., 15:03, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's true. However, with Clojure now having a specific meaning for > "atom" that's different from that of the larger Lisp world, I'm > wondering if it would be a good idea to remove atom? from pred.clj. > > Feedback welcome.
I would think so. Or come up with a different name. non-coll? ? Sincerely Meikel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
