Hello, On Nov 3, 7:54 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 3, 5:35 am, J. Pablo Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One thing that might be doable and acceptable is dual licensing. If > > Clojure is realsed as CPL *and* GPL, it can be combined with GPL > > programs and it is not in any way more free than the CPL (say, like if > > you add BSD in the bag). In that way you can keep GPLists happy and > > still use CPL. > > It doesn't even have to be dual-licensed with the GPL. It just has to > be dual licensed > with a GPL *compatible* license.
True, it can be LGPL, BSD, etc. I proposed GPL because is the one that leaves less freedom, thus changing as little as possible the current situation. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
