On Oct 28, 8:48 am, Stuart Halloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Java does thread protect, but it is synchronized. Also java.math and > java.util's random number generator aren't pluggable with alternate > implementations. For that I would need SecureRandom. > > For my simple example I think I will use a per-thread > java.util.Random, note the issues, and point interested readers to the > literature.
Does using a per-thread java.util.Random object guarantee that the threads' random streams are not correlated? If you pick the seeds unluckily then the threads' random streams might overlap, making the Monte Carlo method's results suspect. mfh --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
