Hi Stuart,
Thanks, that's a nice alternative approach!
Bill
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Stuart Halloway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> You could do something like this:
>
> (defn seq-xor-2-seqs
> "Returns the unique values that are in one sequence but not the
> other."
> [x y]
> (let [x (into #{} x)
> y (into #{} y)]
> (lazy-cat (clojure.set/difference x y)
> (clojure.set/difference y x))))
>
> Not sure this is more idiomatic, though. And I guess it would perform
> worse with huge collections...
>
> Stuart
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've put on my blog (http://bc.tech.coop/blog/081027.html) a post
>> about some Clojure language features. In the post, I point out the
>> features in a couple of functions that I wrote (which do an "exclusive
>> or (XOR)" on sequences). Since I'm new to Clojure and still learning
>> how to do things, I would appreciate any comments on whether the code
>> could be re-written in a more "idiomatic" manner in Clojure.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bill
>> >
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
