Hi Bill,
You could do something like this:
(defn seq-xor-2-seqs
"Returns the unique values that are in one sequence but not the
other."
[x y]
(let [x (into #{} x)
y (into #{} y)]
(lazy-cat (clojure.set/difference x y)
(clojure.set/difference y x))))
Not sure this is more idiomatic, though. And I guess it would perform
worse with huge collections...
Stuart
> Hi all,
>
> I've put on my blog (http://bc.tech.coop/blog/081027.html) a post
> about some Clojure language features. In the post, I point out the
> features in a couple of functions that I wrote (which do an "exclusive
> or (XOR)" on sequences). Since I'm new to Clojure and still learning
> how to do things, I would appreciate any comments on whether the code
> could be re-written in a more "idiomatic" manner in Clojure.
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
