On Oct 17, 7:24 pm, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> > As far as into-array taking a type, I'm fine with that, but the type
> > should come first.
>
> Rich,
>
> I uploaded a patch for this to the group on September 20:
>
> http://clojure.googlegroups.com/web/into-array-type.patch
>
> I just updated it to be a patch for svn 1073.
>
> Here's the doc:
>
> user=> (doc into-array)
> -------------------------
> clojure/into-array
> ([aseq] [type aseq])
> Returns an array with components set to the values in aseq. The
> array's
> component type is type if provided, or the type of the first value in
> aseq if present, or Object. All values in aseq must be compatible
> with
> the component type. Class objects for the primitive types can be
> obtained
> using, e.g., Integer/TYPE.
> nil
> user=>
>
> Could you please let me know whether this is still a change you'll
> consider?
>
Patch applied (SVN 1074) - thanks!
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
