On Sep 20, 11:16 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As far as into-array taking a type, I'm fine with that, but the type > should come first.
That would be useful when you need to create an array of an abstract type, like an interface. I posted a version here: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/1c02773d070decd5 -Stuart --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
