On Oct 2, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> True, but what I am concerned about is cognitive load in understanding
> the language. Right now, there is some set of functions that work on
> seq-able things, and another set of functions that work only on actual
> seqs. Is there a reason that sort belongs in the latter camp?
I made a (probably imperfect) survey of all the functions documented on:
http://clojure.org/sequences
that take coll arguments. I found that only the sort and sort-by
functions do not call "seq" on their coll argument automatically.
I think changing them to be consistent with the rest of the sequence
functions in this regard would be a good idea.
--Steve
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
