True, but what I am concerned about is cognitive load in understanding the language. Right now, there is some set of functions that work on seq-able things, and another set of functions that work only on actual seqs. Is there a reason that sort belongs in the latter camp?
Stuart > > You could sort this way: > user> (apply str (sort (seq "bac"))) > "abc" > > On Oct 2, 11:58 am, Stuart Halloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Right. So, should sort work? >> >> user=> (sort "bca") >> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Class java.lang.String does >> not implement the requested interface java.util.Collection >> >> Stuart >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
