Yes, I'd like to see *err* added too. I did my own *err* for a custom
REPL and was surprised it wasn't already part of the environment just
like *out*.

On Sep 29, 9:24 am, Thorsen Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I would love to see this change as well.
>
> Eric
>
> On Sep 28, 2008, at 1:28 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
>
> > For a socket repl, I'd like to have error output sent across the  
> > wire as well as normal output. Clojure currently provides vars (*in*  
> > and *out*) that allow a thread to redirect input and output. I  
> > suggest a new var *err* which allows redirecting error output as well.
>
> > I can mostly do this without a change to Clojure by using my own  
> > alternative to Repl.java, but there are several instances in Clojure  
> > where System.err is accessed directly. If those were made indirect  
> > through a new *err*, one could reliably redirect all of *in*, *out*,  
> > and *err*.
>
> > Here's the *err* definition I suggest for RT.java:
>
> > final static public Var ERR =
> >            Var.intern(CLOJURE_NS, Symbol.create("*err*"),
> >                       new PrintWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(System.err,  
> > UTF8), true));
>
> > (A PrintWriter with auto-flush.)
>
> > I think PrintWriter is a good choice because Throwable offers a  
> > method to dump stack traces to a PrintWriter.
>
> > --Steve
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to