On Saturday, August 31, 2019 12:04:36 PM EDT Henrik K wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 04:48:54PM +0100, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote: > > More testing, by people prepared to chip in some effort instead of > > complaining about something that they get for free, would be great. > > The final responsibility of implementing and testing the issue is still that > of the ClamAV team. > > You are really making this much more complex and "scary" issue than it is. > New features and major versions have been constantly released these past > years. Just because someone in the bug had a random issue with patch that > wasn't even analyzed by devs, doesn't mean it will "break millions of > systems" - especially if it isn't enabled by default (which is wise, since > it would need more memory). It's simply a matter of willing to check and > implement it.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but if you are unhappy with the service you are receiving, you should switch to a different vendor. I suspect it's unlikely you'll get the same value for money elsewhere. Scott K _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
