On 06/23/2012 09:54 AM, Frank Chan wrote:
On 22-06-2012 19:31, Al Varnell wrote:
On 6/22/12 7:00 PM, "Frank Chan" <fc...@molsci.org> wrote:
[snip]
For a couple of days after 0.97.5 was known to exist, it was not
actually
posted to the web page. Even after the hyperlink title was changed, the
older version was still what downloaded. Double check to make
certain what
you downloaded was "clamav-0.97.5.tar.gz".
-Al-
I've double checked that it is clamav-0.97.5.tar.gz with the new VRT
signature and not the Tomaz signature. I also checked it I was
compiling from the clamav-0.97.5 directory and check it was compiling
correctly. I've been using clamav since 2004 so I've been doing the
same thing for awhile several systems including this RHEL 5.1 that I
have been running since 2008 and updated by Red Hat weekly. Again I
used the same clamav-0.97.5.tar.gz file for my MacBookPro and other
older Linux systems no problem. This first time I ever seen this on
RHEL 5.1.
Frank
You state you are using Epel, does that download complete .rpm files or
source files? If Epel uses .rpm binary files, then you should stop the
daemons and do remove using rpm.
If you built 0.97.4 from source, then you did the correct thing with
make uninstall after you should stop the daemons first.
Other than that, dp's suggestions are the next step. I know for a fact,
due to running Redhat derivatives, that the RPM locations are different
from the standard Clamav source build locations. And not realizing that
made the change from packaged RPMs to building my own involved some
investigation into locations and then standardizing based on what I
wanted to do with the source building.
If you have been using the rpm files and want to continue doing so using
the latest source, you can build your own rpm file using rpmbuild and a
spec file.
--
Jim Preston
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
