On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 14:30 -0600, Robert Wyatt wrote: > It's truly amazing to me how much discussion can be had with > absolutely no reference to ClamAV. > > It almost seems like we could write a white paper on spam, but of > course that's so yesterday. It's much more stimulating to pretend like > this is the first time anyone ever thought of dealing with it. > > Sorry that I didn't include the entire preceding thread here, but it's > available on the archive if you need to refer to it (see automatically > applied footer below for link). > > Thanks, > Robert
The last time I checked the discussion was based upon scanning outbound mail for Viruses at the gateway, but thank you for your self righteous 'net nanny' input Robert. However, your post does qualify as noise and I'm ashamed of myself for responding to you. You really are *not* worth a paragraph. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
