On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:59 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:14:50 +1300
> Steve Holdoway <st...@greengecko.co.nz> articulated:
> 
> > You what? In the last case I had a problem, it was a networked pc
> > infected with a trojan spewing spam out. Just *how* does SMTP Auth
> > stop this?
> > 
> > Your lack of knowledge is matched only by your inability to spell ( no
> > irregardless is *not* a word ), or to put your clock right.
> 
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless
> 
> Wow, you could not take the time to even look up a word. What is your
> job description again? It wouldn't be "troll" would it?
You seem to know alot about trolls Jerry. Where I come from the phrase
'takes one to know one' is pretty accurate.
> 
> By the way, what is this 'clock' statement in reference to?
> 
> In addition, many ISPs have instituted SMTP authentication, even SSL/TLS
> is an attempt to thwart the transmission of malicious material. 

It is? I see. So if legitimate users decide to forward on a funny email
attachment that just so happens to contain malware, are you saying SASL
and TLS stops this?

Please examine your arsehole, you appear to be speaking from it TROLL.

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to