On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:59 -0500, Jerry wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:14:50 +1300 > Steve Holdoway <st...@greengecko.co.nz> articulated: > > > You what? In the last case I had a problem, it was a networked pc > > infected with a trojan spewing spam out. Just *how* does SMTP Auth > > stop this? > > > > Your lack of knowledge is matched only by your inability to spell ( no > > irregardless is *not* a word ), or to put your clock right. > > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless > > Wow, you could not take the time to even look up a word. What is your > job description again? It wouldn't be "troll" would it? You seem to know alot about trolls Jerry. Where I come from the phrase 'takes one to know one' is pretty accurate. > > By the way, what is this 'clock' statement in reference to? > > In addition, many ISPs have instituted SMTP authentication, even SSL/TLS > is an attempt to thwart the transmission of malicious material.
It is? I see. So if legitimate users decide to forward on a funny email attachment that just so happens to contain malware, are you saying SASL and TLS stops this? Please examine your arsehole, you appear to be speaking from it TROLL. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml