> > Steven Stern wrote: > > > Checking outgoing mail is pointless. Why bother?
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:33:09 -0500 > Kris Deugau <kdeu...@vianet.ca> articulated: > > So you can reduce malware propagation? (And as a result, maybe not > > end up on everyone's local blacklist for spewing garbage...) On 24.02.10 11:38, Jerry wrote: > It is still pointless and a waste of processing power. you like being on blacklist after your users start spewing spam and viruses, don't you? > > > If I were mailing malware, I'd be sure to mark that it had been > > > scanned, approved, and was safe to open. > > > > *nod* I won't trust third-party headers claiming mail is safe or > > non-spam... I *will* happily trust third-party headers that say it's > > malicious or spam. > > Again, pointless. I do not believe that there is any industrial > standard or RFC that specifically states how to insert a header that > that marks an e-mail as infected. doesn't that "*nod*" mean anything? > Simply employing your own AV software is a lot simpler, and probably more > reliable. of course we do. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. The only substitute for good manners is fast reflexes. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
