On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 17:29 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Derek Currie wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2008, at 12/06, 7:26 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: > > > >> There is > >> no naming standard. > > > > Again with the misinformation. There is, in fact, a naming standard,
Prove it. > > and an organization designated to provide those names. Whether an > > anti-malware provider chooses to use the official name is up to them. > > > > I'll let you find that standardized naming organization on your own. > > Homework. > > > > Sheesh. Must be a low pressure day.. > > I have a bad feeling you're referring to CME. Probably not, there is only on OSX virus listed on CME, CME-4 is known to clamav as Trojan.Leap.A. The project has also been dead for two years. Now, back on topic. I'm certain that if I were to submit a copy of the W.A.N.K worm, that the clamav people would be happy to create a signature and distribute it, even though there probably hasn't been a production Vax/VMS system susceptible to it in a decade. It's not a lack of desire for OSX malware, merely a lack of samples. And the sample submission process is well known - you can submit samples straight to the clamav project, or to virustotal, or jotti. -- Dan McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP# 78281, CNX www.austinenergy.com _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
