On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 08:32:42 -0700
Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Colin Alston wrote:
>> On 2008/10/04 12:50 PM Jerry wrote:
>>> From my experience, if an end user refuses to RTFM, adding
>>> additional reading material is not going to solve the problem. The
>>> needed documentation is all ready readily available. The motivation
>>> to fetch and read it are what is sorely lacking.
>> 
>> You're confusing "RTFM" with "Being required to RTFM all over again 
>> with every single new release just to get the daemon to run all over 
>> again".
>> 
>> I'm not all that interested if you have time for that. I don't, and 
>> neither do most end users regardless of your opinion about their 
>> intellect or ability.
>
>Hopefully they're not running mail servers on the Internet elsewise
>they could easily be considered derelict in their responsibilities. If
>they do run mail servers on the Internet I'd be interested in some
>domain names for my filters.

The sad part is that they will continue to blame others for their
lackadaisical approach. If they want to know who is ultimately
responsible for their problems, all they need do is look into a mirror.
However, after listening to some of the posters here, even that might
be too much of a bother.

PS: If you get a list of those servers, CC: me a copy.


-- 
Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You will receive a legacy which will place you above want.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to