Jonathan Armitage wrote: > Tom Bombadil wrote: > >> Thanks Christopher, >> >> Yeah... there is definitely a problem here when using clamd over tcp. >> >> Any idea guys? >> >>
No sign of problems here (busy systems, Solaris 9 over TCP). We had lots of load/stability problems with the early 0.90 versions, but 0.90.3 worked fine. Load looks the same running 0.91.1. Are all the people having problems using --with-experimental perhaps? -- -------------------------------- Adam Stephens Network Specialist - Email & DNS [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Christopher X. Candreva wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Tom Bombadil wrote: >>> --with-experimental >>> >>> >>>> Is anybody else experience a much higher load with 0.91 compared to 0.90.3? >>>> > > > Not sure if this is the same thing, but I compiled ClamAV 0.91 and > 0.91.1 --with-experimental on Solaris 10 Sparc. > > Clamd kept dying (disappearing without trace), I suspect at busy times, > as has been reported here for earlier versions. > > I recompiled 0.91.1 without the experimental code, and put clamd under > control of the Solaris Service Management Facility so that it would > restart itself if it died again. > > I haven't seen any restarts in the log since, but Exim is occasionally > complaining that it can't connect to the socket, something you normally > only see when you stop and start clamd. > > Jon > > Jon Armitage > Systems Admin > www.365mediagroup.co.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net > http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html > _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
