Tom Bombadil wrote: > Thanks Christopher, > > Yeah... there is definitely a problem here when using clamd over tcp. > > Any idea guys? > > Christopher X. Candreva wrote: >> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Tom Bombadil wrote: >> >>> Is anybody else experience a much higher load with 0.91 compared to 0.90.3? > Not sure if this is the same thing, but I compiled ClamAV 0.91 and 0.91.1 --with-experimental on Solaris 10 Sparc.
Clamd kept dying (disappearing without trace), I suspect at busy times, as has been reported here for earlier versions. I recompiled 0.91.1 without the experimental code, and put clamd under control of the Solaris Service Management Facility so that it would restart itself if it died again. I haven't seen any restarts in the log since, but Exim is occasionally complaining that it can't connect to the socket, something you normally only see when you stop and start clamd. Jon Jon Armitage Systems Admin www.365mediagroup.co.uk _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
